FSGGX vs. FPADX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX).
FSGGX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Index. It was launched on Aug 9, 2011. FPADX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSGGX or FPADX.
Correlation
The correlation between FSGGX and FPADX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FSGGX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FSGGX:
0.77
FPADX:
0.63
FSGGX:
1.15
FPADX:
1.00
FSGGX:
1.16
FPADX:
1.13
FSGGX:
0.93
FPADX:
0.43
FSGGX:
2.88
FPADX:
1.94
FSGGX:
4.28%
FPADX:
5.61%
FSGGX:
16.07%
FPADX:
17.19%
FSGGX:
-34.76%
FPADX:
-39.16%
FSGGX:
-1.51%
FPADX:
-16.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly higher than FPADX's 3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FSGGX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 4.59%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.57% annualized return.
FSGGX
8.25%
-0.70%
3.42%
11.07%
10.77%
4.59%
FPADX
3.82%
-2.25%
-1.73%
9.36%
6.85%
2.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSGGX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSGGX vs. FPADX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FSGGX
FPADX
FSGGX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSGGX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison
FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than FPADX's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSGGX Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund | 2.69% | 2.91% | 2.95% | 2.64% | 2.60% | 1.71% | 2.85% | 2.66% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 2.44% | 2.61% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 2.60% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 2.47% | 2.14% | 1.50% | 2.59% | 2.20% | 1.76% | 1.69% | 2.47% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
FSGGX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and FPADX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSGGX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) at 9.57%. This indicates that FSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.