PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGX vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGX vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -40.36% return.


FFGX

1D
-2.29%
1M
-2.14%
6M
5.70%
YTD
10.94%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-1.12%
1M
6.51%
6M
-42.88%
YTD
-40.36%
1Y
-41.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
10.94%27.85%-9.98%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-40.36%-11.37%8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FETH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX
FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFGXFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.93

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

-0.61

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

-0.96

+6.63

FFGX vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGXFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-67.94%

+52.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-67.94%

+55.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.72%

-63.51%

+57.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-34.52%

+31.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

43.12%

-39.70%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) is 7.98%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that FFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGXFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

16.12%

-8.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.96%

46.94%

-28.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

68.30%

-48.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

71.86%

-51.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.67%

71.86%

-51.19%

FFGX vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGX vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
1.56%1.62%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGX and FETH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to FFGX (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.95% vs FETH's -67.94%.

On 1-year performance, FFGX leads with 19.32% vs -41.37% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FFGX has been the lower-risk option at 7.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFGX has performed better with a 19.32% return vs -41.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FFGX.

FFGX has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FFGX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFGX and 0.25% for FETH.

FFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGX and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer