PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGX vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGX vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -40.26% return.


FFGX

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.05%
6M
16.18%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-1.34%
1M
-25.20%
YTD
-40.26%
6M
-43.59%
1Y
-32.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
14.05%27.85%-2.87%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-40.26%-11.37%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FETH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX
FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGXFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.96

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

-0.52

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

-0.86

+8.38

FFGX vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFGXFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

-0.48

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

-0.42

+1.78

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGXFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-64.00%

+49.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-63.45%

+50.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-63.45%

+62.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-32.79%

+30.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

38.03%

-34.78%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) is 6.58%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that FFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGXFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

9.77%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

45.28%

-29.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

68.41%

-50.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

72.20%

-53.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

72.20%

-53.16%

FFGX vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGX vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
1.40%1.62%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGX and FETH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to FFGX (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.79% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FFGX leads with 24.38% vs -32.61% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FFGX has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFGX has performed better with a 24.38% return vs -32.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FFGX.

FFGX has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FFGX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFGX and 0.25% for FETH.

FFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGX and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer