FFGX vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FFGX (Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFGX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FFGX returned 24.38% vs 5.08% for FBND. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFGX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.

Performance

FFGX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.61% return.

FFGX

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: 14.05%
• 6M: 16.18%
• 1Y: 24.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBND

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 5.08%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 0.86%
• 10Y*: 2.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	14.05%	27.85%	-2.87%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.61%	7.57%	-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FBND is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024	0.29

Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX

FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 38
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFGX	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.34	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.97	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	1.91	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.52	5.77	+1.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFGX vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFGX	FBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.34	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.45	+0.91

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGX	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.79%	-17.25%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.86%	-2.66%	-10.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-1.32%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-3.35%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	0.88%	+2.37%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.26%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGX	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.58%	1.26%	+5.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.61%	2.73%	+12.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.76%	3.86%	+13.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	5.92%	+13.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.04%	6.09%	+12.95%

FFGX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than FBND's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.70%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	1.40%	1.62%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGX and FBND in my portfolio?

FFGX and FBND have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFGX or FBND?

FFGX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to FBND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.79% vs FBND's -17.25%.

Which ETF is better, FFGX or FBND?

On 1-year performance, FFGX leads with 24.38% vs 5.08% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFGX or FBND?

Over the 1-year period, FFGX has performed better with a 24.38% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFGX or FBND?

FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FFGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFGX or FBND?

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 1.40% for FFGX.

What is the main difference between FFGX and FBND?

FFGX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFGX and 0.36% for FBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.