FBND vs. BNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX).
FBND and BNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBND is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013.
Performance
FBND vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBND vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.12% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.02% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 8.77% | -12.76% | -2.29% | 4.65% | 7.87% | 2.81% | 2.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FBND has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.
FBND
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBND vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBND vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank
FBND
BNDX
FBND vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBND | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.85 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 1.19 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.15 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.01 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 4.10 | +1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBND | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.85 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.04 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.43 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.61 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBND and BNDX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FBND vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than BNDX's 4.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.73% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
FBND vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and BNDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBND | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -16.23% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -2.93% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -15.86% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.25% | -16.23% | -1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -1.99% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -3.10% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.72% | +0.18% |
Volatility
FBND vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBND | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.74% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 2.29% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44% | 3.21% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 4.81% | +1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 4.05% | +2.03% |