FFGX vs. BDMAX
FFGX (Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF) and BDMAX (BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund) are both funds - FFGX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while BDMAX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FFGX returned 24.38% vs 21.53% for BDMAX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFGX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for BDMAX.
Performance
FFGX vs. BDMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than BDMAX's 12.42% return.
FFGX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 16.18%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDMAX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 15.05%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 21.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
FFGX vs. BDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | 14.05% | 27.85% | -2.87% |
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund | 12.42% | 18.08% | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGX and BDMAX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFGX vs. BDMAX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGX
BDMAX
FFGX vs. BDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGX | BDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.61 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 6.12 | -4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | 17.39 | -9.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGX | BDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 3.19 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
FFGX vs. BDMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, which is greater than BDMAX's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and BDMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGX | BDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -12.37% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -3.55% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -2.82% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 1.25% | +2.00% |
Volatility
FFGX vs. BDMAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX) at 1.86%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFGX | BDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 1.86% | +4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 4.42% | +11.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.76% | 6.81% | +10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 6.52% | +12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 5.81% | +13.23% |
FFGX vs. BDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BDMAX's 1.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFGX vs. BDMAX - Dividend Comparison
FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than BDMAX's 7.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund | 7.95% | 8.94% | 13.39% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 1.25% | 0.04% | 6.60% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.56% |
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | 1.40% | 1.62% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFGX and BDMAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFGX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to BDMAX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.79% vs BDMAX's -12.37%.
BDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFGX and BDMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer