BDMAX vs. BAMBX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BDMAX (BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund) and BAMBX (BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - BDMAX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BAMBX is a Multistrategy fund tracking the ICE BofA 3 Month Treasury Bill Index (G0O1) (USD). BDMAX is actively managed, while BAMBX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BDMAX returned 8.07%/yr vs 4.22%/yr for BAMBX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDMAX charges 1.60%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for BAMBX.

Performance

BDMAX vs. BAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDMAX achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than BAMBX's -0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BDMAX has outperformed BAMBX with an annualized return of 8.07%, while BAMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.22% annualized return.

BDMAX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 4.46%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 6M: 14.95%
• 1Y: 20.84%
• 3Y*: 21.37%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

BAMBX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: -0.68%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 0.98%
• 3Y*: 5.73%
• 5Y*: 3.09%
• 10Y*: 4.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDMAX vs. BAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund	11.86%	18.08%	21.12%	14.27%	1.57%	3.11%	-0.05%	-1.02%	1.86%	12.57%
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund	-0.68%	4.59%	6.61%	6.19%	-3.23%	5.84%	3.34%	8.25%	1.51%	9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BDMAX and BAMBX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.10

Return for Risk

BDMAX vs. BAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDMAX

BDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 91
BDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

BAMBX

BAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3
BAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDMAX vs. BAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDMAX	BAMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	0.21	+2.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.72	0.34	+4.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.04	+0.56
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.89	0.19	+5.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.87	0.53	+16.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDMAX vs. BAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDMAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the BAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDMAX and BAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDMAX	BAMBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	0.21	+2.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.93	0.84	+1.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.39	1.18	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	1.27	-0.08

Drawdowns

BDMAX vs. BAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDMAX drawdown since its inception was -12.37%, which is greater than BAMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDMAX and BAMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDMAX	BAMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.37%	-8.84%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.55%	-5.19%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.15%	-5.19%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.49%	-6.66%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.71%	-8.84%	-0.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.73%	+4.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-1.25%	-1.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	1.86%	-0.60%

Volatility

BDMAX vs. BAMBX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) at 1.26%. This indicates that BDMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDMAX	BAMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.98%	1.26%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.42%	3.37%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.83%	4.16%	+2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.53%	3.67%	+2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.82%	3.60%	+2.22%

BDMAX vs. BAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDMAX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMBX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDMAX vs. BAMBX - Dividend Comparison

BDMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, more than BAMBX's 1.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund	1.98%	1.97%	3.86%	4.13%	4.70%	2.39%	1.09%	3.73%	8.70%	3.81%	4.82%	0.00%
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund	7.99%	8.94%	13.39%	7.14%	0.00%	1.25%	0.04%	6.60%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDMAX and BAMBX in my portfolio?

BDMAX and BAMBX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDMAX or BAMBX?

BDMAX has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to BAMBX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDMAX dropped -12.37% vs BAMBX's -8.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.