FFGCX vs. ADM
FFGCX (Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund) is Commodities fund managed by Fidelity, while ADM (Archer-Daniels-Midland Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FFGCX returned 12.49%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for ADM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FFGCX vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGCX achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 33.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGCX has outperformed ADM with an annualized return of 12.49%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.
FFGCX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- 1Y
- 36.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
ADM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 33.79%
- 6M
- 33.84%
- 1Y
- 48.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
FFGCX vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 15.94% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -13.21% | 17.18% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 33.79% | 18.24% | -27.52% | -20.42% | 39.98% | 37.33% | 12.44% | 17.10% | 5.28% | -9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGCX and ADM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2009 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FFGCX and ADM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFGCX vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank
FFGCX
ADM
FFGCX vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFGCX | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 3.78 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.91 | 10.04 | +4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFGCX vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and ADM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGCX | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -68.01% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -12.79% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.24% | -49.22% | +29.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.22% | -54.14% | +26.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.43% | -54.14% | +5.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -13.26% | +4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.32% | -21.59% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 4.81% | -2.40% |
Volatility
FFGCX vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) is 5.37%, while Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that FFGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFGCX | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 7.89% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 19.38% | -5.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 26.86% | -9.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 28.25% | -6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 26.94% | -4.50% |
Dividends
FFGCX vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than ADM's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.72% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.18% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFGCX and ADM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to FFGCX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGCX dropped -57.23% vs ADM's -68.01%.
FFGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFGCX and ADM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer