FFGCX vs. DNLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX).
FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. DNLAX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003.
Performance
FFGCX vs. DNLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGCX vs. DNLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 22.87% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -13.21% | 17.18% |
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 22.63% | 14.75% | 0.86% | 1.33% | 33.83% | 38.00% | 6.30% | 16.33% | -17.78% | 13.69% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFGCX having a 22.87% return and DNLAX slightly lower at 22.63%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFGCX having a 13.82% annualized return and DNLAX not far ahead at 14.07%.
FFGCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 52.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
DNLAX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 22.63%
- 6M
- 31.46%
- 1Y
- 47.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGCX vs. DNLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGCX vs. DNLAX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGCX
DNLAX
FFGCX vs. DNLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGCX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 1.78 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 2.24 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.36 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 2.10 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.89 | 9.54 | +8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGCX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 1.78 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.70 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.55 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.36 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGCX and DNLAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFGCX vs. DNLAX - Dividend Comparison
FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than DNLAX's 1.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.06% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 1.79% | 2.19% | 7.75% | 12.54% | 9.80% | 5.04% | 0.91% | 1.95% | 1.53% | 0.40% | 1.26% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
FFGCX vs. DNLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, smaller than the maximum DNLAX drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and DNLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGCX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -69.14% | +11.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -20.87% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.22% | -32.37% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.43% | -54.45% | +6.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -2.30% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -21.71% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 4.59% | -1.76% |
Volatility
FFGCX vs. DNLAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) have volatilities of 6.10% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGCX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 6.09% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 15.21% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 26.61% | -6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 25.94% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 25.58% | -3.04% |