PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFYX vs. URINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFYX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class C (FFFYX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFYX achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than URINX's 6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFYX has outperformed URINX with an annualized return of 11.14%, while URINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.


FFFYX

1D
1.29%
1M
0.51%
6M
7.75%
YTD
11.84%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
7.21%

URINX

1D
0.34%
1M
0.42%
6M
4.40%
YTD
6.24%
1Y
11.37%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
5.59%
ALL TIME*
6.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFFYX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFYX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class C
11.84%27.84%12.53%18.08%-18.94%14.82%16.41%25.42%-9.22%20.44%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
6.24%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%6.47%8.74%11.72%-3.00%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFYX and URINX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2008

0.90

The correlation between FFFYX and URINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFYX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFFYX
FFFYX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FFFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFFYX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class C (FFFYX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFYXURINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.07

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.44

12.91

-3.47

FFFYX vs. URINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the URINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFYX and URINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFFYX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFYX drawdown since its inception was -58.62%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFYX and URINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFYXURINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.62%

-15.27%

-43.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-3.92%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.19%

-4.84%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.99%

-15.27%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.38%

-15.27%

-16.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.04%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-1.90%

-7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

0.93%

+1.47%

Volatility

FFFYX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class C (FFFYX) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) at 1.41%. This indicates that FFFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFYXURINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

1.41%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

4.80%

+7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

5.64%

+8.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

6.37%

+9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

5.87%

+9.74%

FFFYX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFYX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFYX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison

FFFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than URINX's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFYX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class C
6.45%9.68%0.92%0.80%10.23%9.02%4.86%6.25%10.95%3.72%3.98%2.96%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.80%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FFFYX and URINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFYX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to URINX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFYX dropped -58.62% vs URINX's -15.27%.

URINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFYX and URINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer