FFFHX vs. FSMDX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FFFHX (Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund) and FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FFFHX is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FSMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. FFFHX is actively managed, while FSMDX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFFHX returned 11.91%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for FSMDX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFFHX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FSMDX.

Performance

FFFHX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFHX achieves a 11.83% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 14.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFFHX having a 11.91% annualized return and FSMDX not far behind at 11.45%.

FFFHX

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: -1.19%
• 6M: 7.77%
• YTD: 11.83%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: 17.79%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 11.91%
• ALL TIME*: 8.02%

FSMDX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: 11.53%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: 14.95%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: 11.45%
• ALL TIME*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FFFHX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	11.83%	23.72%	14.11%	20.45%	-18.29%	16.59%	18.25%	25.33%	-8.90%	22.29%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	14.95%	10.58%	15.55%	17.20%	-17.27%	22.56%	17.13%	30.53%	-9.38%	18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFHX and FSMDX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.91

The correlation between FFFHX and FSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FFFHX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFFHX

FFFHX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FFFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FFFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FFFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FFFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FFFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FSMDX

FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFFHX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFFHX	FSMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.34	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	1.96	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.24	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.25	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.75	8.71	+1.04

FFFHX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFHX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFFHX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFHX drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFHX and FSMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFFHX	FSMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.38%	-40.35%	-16.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.70%	-8.16%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.36%	-20.92%	+5.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.39%	-26.07%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.91%	-40.35%	+9.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-0.66%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-4.91%	-3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	2.11%	+0.21%

Volatility

FFFHX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 2.42%. This indicates that FFFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFFHX	FSMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	2.42%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.28%	10.22%	+2.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.31%	13.71%	+0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	18.26%	-3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	19.27%	-3.88%

FFFHX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFHX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFFHX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

FFFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than FSMDX's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	5.35%	4.14%	1.86%	1.78%	11.83%	11.76%	4.93%	6.48%	7.69%	3.98%	4.12%	4.16%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	0.76%	1.10%	2.46%	1.39%	2.07%	3.35%	2.34%	2.86%	2.21%	2.17%	2.23%	2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFFHX and FSMDX in my portfolio?

FFFHX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFFHX or FSMDX?

FFFHX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FSMDX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFHX dropped -56.38% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.