FFFHX vs. FFSFX
FFFHX (Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund) and FFSFX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFFHX returned 9.91%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for FFSFX. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
FFFHX vs. FFSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFFHX having a 11.83% return and FFSFX slightly higher at 12.07%.
FFFHX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 11.83%
- 1Y
- 24.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.02%
FFSFX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FFFHX vs. FFSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund | 11.83% | 23.72% | 14.11% | 20.45% | -18.29% | 16.59% | 18.25% | 9.57% |
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund | 12.07% | 23.76% | 14.01% | 20.54% | -18.28% | 16.54% | 18.08% | 9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFFHX and FFSFX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FFFHX and FFSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFFHX vs. FFSFX — Risk / Return Rank
FFFHX
FFSFX
FFFHX vs. FFSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFFHX | FFSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.34 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | 9.78 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFFHX vs. FFSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFFHX drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, which is greater than FFSFX's maximum drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFHX and FFSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFFHX | FFSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.38% | -31.03% | -25.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.70% | -9.79% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -15.43% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.39% | -27.31% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -2.51% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -5.81% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.34% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FFFHX vs. FFSFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFFHX | FFSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.45% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 12.45% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 14.46% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 15.29% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 17.07% | -1.68% |
FFFHX vs. FFSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FFFHX and FFSFX have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
FFFHX vs. FFSFX - Dividend Comparison
FFFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than FFSFX's 4.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund | 5.35% | 4.14% | 1.86% | 1.78% | 11.83% | 11.76% | 4.93% | 6.48% | 7.69% | 3.98% | 4.12% | 4.16% |
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund | 4.99% | 3.69% | 2.29% | 2.01% | 8.77% | 7.81% | 2.25% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FFFHX and FFSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FFSFX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to FFFHX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFHX dropped -56.38% vs FFSFX's -31.03%.
FFSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFFHX and FFSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer