FFFHX vs. SWYMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FFFHX (Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund) and SWYMX (Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FFFHX returned 10.89%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for SWYMX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFFHX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWYMX.

Performance

FFFHX vs. SWYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFHX achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than SWYMX's 11.75% return.

FFFHX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 14.64%
• 6M: 14.69%
• 1Y: 32.11%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: 12.62%

SWYMX

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 11.75%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 26.72%
• 3Y*: 17.93%
• 5Y*: 10.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFHX vs. SWYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	14.64%	23.72%	14.11%	20.45%	-18.29%	16.59%	18.25%	25.33%	-8.90%	22.29%
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund	11.75%	19.42%	14.24%	20.92%	-17.65%	17.80%	14.66%	25.34%	-7.58%	20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFHX and SWYMX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016	0.97

The correlation between FFFHX and SWYMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFFHX vs. SWYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFHX

FFFHX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FFFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FFFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FFFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FFFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FFFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SWYMX

SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 69
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFHX vs. SWYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFFHX	SWYMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.22	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.06	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.40	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	3.09	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.30	13.51	+0.79

FFFHX vs. SWYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the SWYMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFHX and SWYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFFHX vs. SWYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFHX drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, which is greater than SWYMX's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFHX and SWYMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFFHX	SWYMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.38%	-30.48%	-25.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.70%	-8.55%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.36%	-14.95%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.39%	-25.37%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.81%	-4.49%	-4.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.95%	+0.27%

Volatility

FFFHX vs. SWYMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) at 4.64%. This indicates that FFFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFFHX	SWYMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	4.64%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.60%	9.77%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.63%	11.87%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	14.82%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.44%	15.64%	-0.20%

FFFHX vs. SWYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYMX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFFHX vs. SWYMX - Dividend Comparison

FFFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than SWYMX's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	5.22%	4.14%	1.86%	1.78%	11.83%	11.76%	4.93%	6.48%	7.69%	3.98%	4.12%	4.16%
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund	1.79%	2.00%	2.03%	1.99%	1.96%	1.78%	1.65%	1.96%	2.15%	1.43%	1.22%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFFHX and SWYMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FFFHX and SWYMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFFHX or SWYMX?

FFFHX has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to SWYMX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFHX dropped -56.38% vs SWYMX's -30.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.