FFF vs. SPY
FFF (Founders 100 ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Founder ETFs, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. FFF is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
FFF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.13% return.
FFF
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $61.65K | $77.62K | $91.68K | |
| $37.27B | $35.99B | $39.23B |
FFF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFF Founders 100 ETF | -3.41% | -1.66% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.13% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFF and SPY is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
FFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPY
FFF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.89% | -55.19% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | -1.40% | -9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -9.01% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility
FFF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.58% | 12.89% | +13.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 17.18% | +9.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 17.95% | +8.63% |
FFF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
FFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFF Founders 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFF and SPY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FFF.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for FFF.
FFF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Founder ETFs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.09% for SPY.
Find the right allocation for FFF and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer