FFF vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FFF (Founders 100 ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

FFF vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 37.33% return.

FFF

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 5.20%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -7.77%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 37.33%
• 6M: 38.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFF vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFF Founders 100 ETF	-0.98%	-1.84%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	37.33%	3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FFF and SGRT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

FFF vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFF	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	2.87	-3.08

Drawdowns

FFF vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFF	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.89%	-17.87%	-4.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.20%	-9.33%	+1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.09%	-3.13%	-6.96%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFF	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.81%	34.54%	-6.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.81%	34.54%	-6.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.81%	34.54%	-6.73%

FFF vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFF vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

FFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025
FFF Founders 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.12%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFF and SGRT in my portfolio?

FFF and SGRT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFF or SGRT?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFF or SGRT?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFF or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for FFF.

What is the main difference between FFF and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.59% for SGRT.