PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFF vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFF vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 13.09% return.


FFF

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.83%
6M
3.03%
YTD
-3.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QARP

1D
0.52%
1M
1.69%
6M
8.81%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$61.65K$77.62K$91.68K
$110.48K$118.49K$177.11K

FFF vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FFF and QARP is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFF vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFF vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.08

FFF vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFF vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.89%

-35.44%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

-0.14%

-10.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-4.37%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

Volatility

FFF vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.58%

10.71%

+15.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.58%

15.52%

+11.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.58%

19.51%

+7.07%

FFF vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFF vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

FFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FFF
Founders 100 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFF and QARP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FFF.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for FFF.

FFF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QARP is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Founder ETFs and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.19% for QARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFF and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer