PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFF vs. GARY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFF vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 25.28% return.


FFF

1D
-4.60%
1M
5.20%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GARY

1D
-4.30%
1M
3.59%
YTD
25.28%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFF vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FFF
Founders 100 ETF
-0.98%-2.89%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
25.28%0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FFF and GARY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFF vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFF vs. GARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFFGARYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

3.28

-3.50

Drawdowns

FFF vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and GARY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFGARYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.89%

-10.28%

-11.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-4.86%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-1.70%

-8.39%

Volatility

FFF vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFGARYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.81%

20.25%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.81%

20.25%

+7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.81%

20.25%

+7.56%

FFF vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFF vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

FFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


PositionTTM2025
FFF
Founders 100 ETF
0.00%0.00%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFF and GARY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FFF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FFF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FFF.

They also come from different issuers: Founder ETFs and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.77% for GARY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFF and GARY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer