FFF vs. GARY
FFF (Founders 100 ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
FFF vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 25.28% return.
FFF
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARY
- 1D
- -4.30%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFF vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFF Founders 100 ETF | -0.98% | -2.89% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 25.28% | 0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFF and GARY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFF vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFF | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 3.28 | -3.50 |
Drawdowns
FFF vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFF | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.89% | -10.28% | -11.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.20% | -4.86% | -3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -1.70% | -8.39% |
Volatility
FFF vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFF | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.81% | 20.25% | +7.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.81% | 20.25% | +7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.81% | 20.25% | +7.56% |
FFF vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFF vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
FFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FFF Founders 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFF and GARY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FFF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FFF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FFF.
They also come from different issuers: Founder ETFs and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for FFF and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer