PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFANX vs. VTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFANX achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FFANX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 6.82%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return.


FFANX

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.83%
YTD
7.09%
6M
7.62%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
6.82%

VTMFX

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.26%
YTD
5.64%
6M
5.70%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
12.61%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.09%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
5.64%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FFANX and VTMFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007

0.91

The correlation between FFANX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFANX
VTMFX

Technology

26.1%
15.8%

Financial Services

16.5%
5.6%

Industrials

13.2%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
4.7%

Healthcare

8.9%
4.0%

Communication Services

7.8%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.5%
1.0%

Energy

3.8%
1.7%

Utilities

2.6%
1.3%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.9%

Technology

FFANX
26.1%
VTMFX
15.8%

Financial Services

FFANX
16.5%
VTMFX
5.6%

Industrials

FFANX
13.2%
VTMFX
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FFANX
9.3%
VTMFX
4.7%

Healthcare

FFANX
8.9%
VTMFX
4.0%

Communication Services

FFANX
7.8%
VTMFX
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

FFANX
5.0%
VTMFX
2.3%

Basic Materials

FFANX
4.5%
VTMFX
1.0%

Energy

FFANX
3.8%
VTMFX
1.7%

Utilities

FFANX
2.6%
VTMFX
1.3%

Real Estate

FFANX
2.3%
VTMFX
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFANX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFANXVTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.52

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.08

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

14.71

-0.26

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFANX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFANX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFANXVTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.70

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.84

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.95

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.84

-0.17

Drawdowns

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFANX drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFANX and VTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFANXVTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.69%

-28.49%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-5.38%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.55%

-10.61%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-17.40%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.52%

-21.87%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.37%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.55%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.12%

+0.07%

Volatility

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 1.74%. This indicates that FFANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFANXVTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

1.74%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

4.76%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

6.14%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.86%

8.52%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.70%

9.12%

-1.42%

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFANX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFANX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

FFANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than VTMFX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.66%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.11%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FFANX and VTMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFANX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to VTMFX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFANX dropped -31.69% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFANX and VTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer