FEZ vs. UPV
FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while UPV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 11.53%/yr vs 12.49%/yr for UPV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UPV.
Performance
FEZ vs. UPV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than UPV's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed UPV with an annualized return of 11.53%, while UPV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.
FEZ
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
UPV
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
FEZ vs. UPV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 6.43% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 7.71% | 68.63% | -4.51% | 32.16% | -36.58% | 32.38% | -3.15% | 47.04% | -32.64% | 57.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and UPV is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FEZ and UPV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEZ vs. UPV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
UPV
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
FEZ
UPV
Technology
FEZ
UPV
-
Industrials
FEZ
UPV
-
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
UPV
-
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
UPV
-
Healthcare
FEZ
UPV
-
Energy
FEZ
UPV
-
Utilities
FEZ
UPV
-
Basic Materials
FEZ
UPV
-
Communication Services
FEZ
UPV
-
Real Estate
FEZ
-
UPV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. UPV — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
UPV
FEZ vs. UPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEZ | UPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 4.44 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. UPV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum UPV drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and UPV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | UPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -67.25% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -23.41% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -27.54% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -58.33% | +23.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -67.25% | +27.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -7.10% | +4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -20.78% | +3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 6.96% | -2.97% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. UPV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 5.85%, while ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | UPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 9.89% | -4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.57% | 26.79% | -11.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.40% | 31.55% | -13.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 35.53% | -14.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 36.43% | -15.68% |
FEZ vs. UPV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UPV's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. UPV - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than UPV's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.64% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 2.13% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 3.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FEZ and UPV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UPV has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to FEZ (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs UPV's -67.25%.
On 10-year performance, UPV leads with 12.49% vs 11.53% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPV has performed better with a 12.49% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPV.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.13% for UPV.
FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while UPV is Leveraged Equities. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.95% for UPV.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and UPV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer