PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. UPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. UPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than UPV's 7.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEZ having a 10.28% annualized return and UPV not far ahead at 10.63%.


FEZ

1D
-1.26%
1M
5.21%
YTD
5.18%
6M
6.87%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
10.28%

UPV

1D
-2.27%
1M
5.04%
YTD
7.15%
6M
12.94%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. UPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
5.18%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
UPV
ProShares Ultra Europe
7.15%68.63%-4.51%32.16%-36.58%32.38%-3.15%47.04%-32.64%57.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and UPV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010

0.90

The correlation between FEZ and UPV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEZ vs. UPV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEZ
UPV

Financial Services

23.4%
35.5%

Industrials

20.1%

-

Technology

17.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.4%

-

Healthcare

5.2%

-

Energy

5.0%

-

Utilities

4.6%

-

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

FEZ
23.4%
UPV
35.5%

Industrials

FEZ
20.1%
UPV

-

Technology

FEZ
17.9%
UPV

-

Consumer Cyclical

FEZ
8.6%
UPV

-

Consumer Defensive

FEZ
5.4%
UPV

-

Healthcare

FEZ
5.2%
UPV

-

Energy

FEZ
5.0%
UPV

-

Utilities

FEZ
4.6%
UPV

-

Communication Services

FEZ
3.5%
UPV

-

Basic Materials

FEZ
3.5%
UPV

-

Real Estate

FEZ

-

UPV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. UPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

UPV
UPV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. UPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEZUPVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

0.93

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

1.43

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.25

4.16

+0.09

FEZ vs. UPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the UPV Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and UPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEZUPVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.93

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.22

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.29

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.25

+0.05

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. UPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum UPV drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and UPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZUPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-67.25%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-23.41%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-27.54%

+11.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-58.33%

+23.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-67.25%

+27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-7.58%

+5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.07%

-20.83%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

6.85%

-2.86%

Volatility

FEZ vs. UPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 6.72%, while ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) has a volatility of 11.54%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZUPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

11.54%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

25.61%

-10.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

30.74%

-12.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

35.38%

-14.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

37.14%

-16.03%

FEZ vs. UPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UPV's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEZ vs. UPV - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than UPV's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.57%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
UPV
ProShares Ultra Europe
2.14%2.11%2.70%1.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FEZ and UPV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UPV has higher volatility (11.54%) compared to FEZ (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs UPV's -67.25%.

On 10-year performance, UPV leads with 10.63% vs 10.28% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPV has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPV.

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.14% for UPV.

FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while UPV is Leveraged Equities. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.95% for UPV.

FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and UPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer