FEZ vs. SPMO
FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 11.34%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
FEZ vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 11.34%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
FEZ vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 7.29% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and SPMO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.57 |
The correlation between FEZ and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEZ vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
SPMO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FEZ
SPMO
Industrials
FEZ
SPMO
Technology
FEZ
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
SPMO
Healthcare
FEZ
SPMO
Energy
FEZ
SPMO
Utilities
FEZ
SPMO
Basic Materials
FEZ
SPMO
Communication Services
FEZ
SPMO
Real Estate
FEZ
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
SPMO
FEZ vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.41 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.44 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 13.01 | -8.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -30.95% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -12.70% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -20.13% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -22.74% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -30.95% | -8.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.68% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -4.60% | -12.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.35% | +0.66% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 6.57%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 10.29% | -3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.48% | 16.73% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 19.48% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 19.65% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 20.48% | +0.63% |
FEZ vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEZ and SPMO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to FEZ (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 11.34% for FEZ. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer