FEZ vs. SCHD
FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 11.34%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FEZ vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.34%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
FEZ vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 7.29% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and SCHD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FEZ and SCHD has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FEZ vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
SCHD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
FEZ
SCHD
Industrials
FEZ
SCHD
Technology
FEZ
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
SCHD
Healthcare
FEZ
SCHD
Energy
FEZ
SCHD
Utilities
FEZ
SCHD
Basic Materials
FEZ
SCHD
Communication Services
FEZ
SCHD
Real Estate
FEZ
-
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
SCHD
FEZ vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEZ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.43 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 5.70 | -4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 13.97 | -9.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -33.37% | -30.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -4.61% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -16.13% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -16.85% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -33.37% | -6.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.03% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -3.31% | -13.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 1.89% | +2.12% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 3.05% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.48% | 7.53% | +7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 10.93% | +7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 14.38% | +6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 16.72% | +4.39% |
FEZ vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEZ and SCHD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEZ has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 11.34% for FEZ. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.52% for FEZ.
FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer