FEZ vs. IVLU
FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and IVLU (iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 11.34%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for IVLU. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IVLU.
Performance
FEZ vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than IVLU's 12.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEZ having a 11.34% annualized return and IVLU not far ahead at 11.63%.
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
IVLU
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 23.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
FEZ vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 7.29% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 12.96% | 46.09% | 6.76% | 20.07% | -5.73% | 15.60% | -4.50% | 15.60% | -15.10% | 23.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and IVLU is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FEZ and IVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEZ vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
IVLU
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FEZ
IVLU
Industrials
FEZ
IVLU
Technology
FEZ
IVLU
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
IVLU
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
IVLU
Healthcare
FEZ
IVLU
Energy
FEZ
IVLU
Utilities
FEZ
IVLU
Basic Materials
FEZ
IVLU
Communication Services
FEZ
IVLU
Real Estate
FEZ
-
IVLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
IVLU
FEZ vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEZ | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.90 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 11.01 | -6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than IVLU's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and IVLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -41.85% | -22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -11.69% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -15.48% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -26.04% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -41.85% | +2.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.53% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -8.57% | -8.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.09% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) at 5.44%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 5.44% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.48% | 12.85% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 15.65% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 16.58% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 17.66% | +3.45% |
FEZ vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than IVLU's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 3.28% | 3.71% | 4.46% | 4.69% | 3.59% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 3.53% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 2.53% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEZ and IVLU have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEZ has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to IVLU (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs IVLU's -41.85%.
On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.63% vs 11.34% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IVLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.63% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.
IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.52% for FEZ.
FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while IVLU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.30% for IVLU.
IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and IVLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer