FEYTX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class M (FEYTX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
FEYTX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 2, 2006. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
FEYTX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEYTX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEYTX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class M | -3.85% | 20.17% | 12.02% | 18.34% | -19.01% | 16.50% | 18.66% | 25.61% | -9.76% | 20.96% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEYTX achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FEYTX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
FEYTX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 17.18%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEYTX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEYTX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEYTX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
FEYTX
FASGX
FEYTX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class M (FEYTX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEYTX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.21 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.73 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.55 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 6.89 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEYTX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.21 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.70 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEYTX and FASGX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FEYTX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
FEYTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEYTX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class M | 5.36% | 5.16% | 2.94% | 0.86% | 4.56% | 2.73% | 1.56% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 2.34% | 0.29% | 4.29% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
FEYTX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEYTX drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEYTX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEYTX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.05% | -47.35% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -9.07% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.35% | -23.54% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.01% | -27.20% | -3.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.38% | -7.95% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -6.74% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.04% | +0.37% |
Volatility
FEYTX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class M (FEYTX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that FEYTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEYTX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 4.57% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 7.78% | +1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 12.82% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 12.14% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 12.56% | +2.61% |