PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEYCX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEYCX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEYCX achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FEYCX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 10.78%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


FEYCX

1D
0.57%
1M
5.15%
YTD
13.65%
6M
14.76%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
10.78%

FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEYCX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEYCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C
13.65%19.59%11.42%17.77%-19.43%15.90%18.08%24.93%-10.15%20.93%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FEYCX and FASGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2005

0.99

The correlation between FEYCX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEYCX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEYCX
FEYCX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FEYCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEYCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEYCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FEYCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEYCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEYCX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEYCXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.49

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.39

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.13

14.98

-0.84

FEYCX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEYCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEYCX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEYCXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.61

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.69

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.79

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.63

-0.17

Drawdowns

FEYCX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEYCX drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEYCX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEYCXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-47.35%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-7.95%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-12.80%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

-23.54%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.02%

-27.20%

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-6.71%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.79%

+0.34%

Volatility

FEYCX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FEYCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEYCXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.30%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

8.39%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

10.34%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

12.27%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.26%

12.65%

+2.61%

FEYCX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEYCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEYCX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FEYCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
FEYCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C
4.15%4.72%2.46%0.39%4.05%2.20%1.11%4.55%4.49%2.36%0.29%3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FEYCX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEYCX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to FASGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEYCX dropped -53.39% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEYCX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer