PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FET vs. PDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FET vs. PDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FET achieves a 38.92% return, which is significantly higher than PDS's 16.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FET has underperformed PDS with an annualized return of -17.14%, while PDS has yielded a comparatively higher -1.92% annualized return.


FET

1D
-0.37%
1M
-10.11%
YTD
38.92%
6M
41.09%
1Y
161.62%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
-17.14%

PDS

1D
0.37%
1M
-13.35%
YTD
16.92%
6M
23.05%
1Y
66.28%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
-1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FET vs. PDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FET
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
38.92%138.54%-30.13%-24.85%83.80%34.87%-64.58%-59.32%-73.44%-29.32%
PDS
Precision Drilling Corporation
16.92%17.70%12.49%-29.22%116.48%114.86%-41.11%-19.54%-42.38%-44.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FET and PDS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012

0.52

The correlation between FET and PDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FET:

$597.53M

PDS:

$1.09B

EPS

FET:

-$0.52

PDS:

-CA$1.13

PS Ratio

FET:

0.77

PDS:

0.86

PB Ratio

FET:

2.13

PDS:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

FET:

$806.90M

PDS:

CA$1.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FET:

$221.67M

PDS:

CA$628.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

FET:

$70.89M

PDS:

CA$485.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FET vs. PDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FET
FET Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FET Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FET Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PDS
PDS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FET vs. PDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) and Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FETPDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.30

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.33

3.64

+3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.83

12.41

+8.41

FET vs. PDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FET Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the PDS Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FET and PDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FET vs. PDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FET drawdown since its inception was -99.56%, roughly equal to the maximum PDS drawdown of -99.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FET and PDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FETPDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.56%

-99.16%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.19%

-18.31%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.62%

-50.50%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.14%

-55.51%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.34%

-95.33%

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.01%

-87.44%

-5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.86%

-69.54%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.79%

5.47%

+2.32%

Volatility

FET vs. PDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) is 13.26%, while Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) has a volatility of 14.19%. This indicates that FET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FETPDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

14.19%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.09%

28.23%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.14%

36.49%

+16.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.71%

48.45%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.46%

59.06%

+23.40%

Dividends

FET vs. PDS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FET nor PDS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FET
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDS
Precision Drilling Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.11%

Financials

FET vs. PDS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and Precision Drilling Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
208.70M
527.41M
(FET) Total Revenue
(PDS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FET values in USD, PDS values in CAD

FET vs. PDS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. and Precision Drilling Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
29.2%
15.5%
Portfolio components
FET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.99M and revenue of 208.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.

PDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Precision Drilling Corporation reported a gross profit of 81.57M and revenue of 527.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.5%.

FET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.01M and revenue of 208.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

PDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Precision Drilling Corporation reported an operating income of 39.72M and revenue of 527.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

FET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 4.49M and revenue of 208.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

PDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Precision Drilling Corporation reported a net income of 17.42M and revenue of 527.41M, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FET and PDS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDS has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to FET (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FET dropped -99.56% vs PDS's -99.16%.

FET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FET and PDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer