FERCX vs. INDAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FERCX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C) and INDAX (ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FERCX returned 15.28%/yr vs 6.87%/yr for INDAX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FERCX charges 1.96%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for INDAX.

Performance

FERCX vs. INDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERCX achieves a 39.60% return, which is significantly higher than INDAX's -14.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FERCX has outperformed INDAX with an annualized return of 15.28%, while INDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.87% annualized return.

FERCX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 12.44%
• YTD: 39.60%
• 6M: 44.80%
• 1Y: 74.34%
• 3Y*: 33.99%
• 5Y*: 7.81%
• 10Y*: 15.28%

INDAX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -2.78%
• YTD: -14.39%
• 6M: -13.28%
• 1Y: -14.47%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: 1.85%
• 10Y*: 6.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERCX vs. INDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	39.60%	35.65%	19.76%	12.64%	-31.29%	-15.75%	71.24%	29.64%	-15.72%	45.46%
INDAX ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund	-14.39%	2.03%	10.94%	16.77%	-12.62%	26.37%	14.68%	8.41%	-12.51%	39.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FERCX and INDAX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2011	0.53

The correlation between FERCX and INDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FERCX vs. INDAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FERCX	INDAX
Technology	42.6%	8.7%
Financial Services	14.9%	32.9%
Industrials	11.3%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	14.8%
Communication Services	7.4%	7.2%
Basic Materials	5.1%	5.5%
Healthcare	4.2%	5.8%
Energy	2.0%	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	4.3%
Real Estate	-	1.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FERCX vs. INDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERCX

FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

INDAX

INDAX Risk / Return Rank: 0
INDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
INDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
INDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
INDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
INDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERCX vs. INDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FERCX	INDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.80	-1.04	+4.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.51	-1.45	+5.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	0.83	+0.84
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.52	-0.73	+6.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.96	-1.72	+21.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FERCX vs. INDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the INDAX Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERCX and INDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FERCX	INDAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.80	-1.04	+4.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.12	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.41	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.35	+0.10

Drawdowns

FERCX vs. INDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERCX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than INDAX's maximum drawdown of -43.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERCX and INDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FERCX	INDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-43.98%	-17.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.62%	-20.85%	+7.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-23.49%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.94%	-23.49%	-30.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.44%	-43.98%	-14.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-20.39%	+20.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.21%	-10.76%	-10.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	8.80%	-5.04%

Volatility

FERCX vs. INDAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX) at 5.14%. This indicates that FERCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FERCX	INDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.57%	5.14%	+3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.66%	12.46%	+4.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.82%	14.51%	+5.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.91%	15.08%	+7.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.98%	16.85%	+4.13%

FERCX vs. INDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than INDAX's 1.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

FERCX vs. INDAX - Dividend Comparison

FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.89%	7.03%	5.13%	6.53%	0.03%	0.56%	0.92%
INDAX ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund	6.57%	5.62%	16.14%	4.43%	1.65%	5.48%	0.00%	1.30%	6.55%	2.79%	1.32%	15.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FERCX and INDAX in my portfolio?

FERCX and INDAX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FERCX or INDAX?

FERCX has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to INDAX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FERCX dropped -61.15% vs INDAX's -43.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FERCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.