FERCX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
FERCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
FERCX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FERCX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 3.43% | 35.65% | 19.76% | 12.64% | -31.29% | -15.75% | 71.24% | 29.64% | -15.72% | 45.46% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -5.35% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FERCX achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -5.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FERCX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 11.88%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.
FERCX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 35.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
FCNTX
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- -5.35%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FERCX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FERCX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FERCX
FCNTX
FERCX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FERCX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.01 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 1.56 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.79 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 6.87 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FERCX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.01 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.69 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.76 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FERCX and FCNTX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FERCX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.89% | 7.03% | 5.13% | 6.53% | 0.03% | 0.56% | 0.92% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 4.93% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
FERCX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FERCX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERCX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FERCX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -49.19% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -11.30% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.94% | -32.59% | -21.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.44% | -32.59% | -25.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.24% | -8.18% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.33% | -8.18% | -13.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 2.95% | +0.88% |
Volatility
FERCX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 6.51%. This indicates that FERCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FERCX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.18% | 6.51% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.84% | 11.12% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 19.95% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 19.19% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 19.64% | +1.08% |