PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQD.L vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEQD.L) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEQD.L is traded in GBP, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEQD.L having a 7.24% return and SCHG slightly lower at 7.22%.


FEQD.L

1D
0.66%
1M
3.00%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.35%
1M
5.69%
YTD
7.22%
6M
5.28%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
16.92%
10Y*
19.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEQD.L
Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF
7.24%23.82%1.33%15.49%-11.08%17.26%2.85%21.96%-7.38%-0.52%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.22%9.13%37.31%42.60%-23.69%29.33%35.05%30.84%4.49%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FEQD.L and SCHG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2017

0.39

The correlation between FEQD.L and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEQD.L
SCHG

Financial Services

24.3%
6.7%

Industrials

19.8%
5.8%

Healthcare

12.8%
7.7%

Technology

9.1%
46.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
1.7%

Energy

5.4%
0.8%

Basic Materials

4.9%
1.4%

Utilities

4.7%
0.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
16.0%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.5%

Financial Services

FEQD.L
24.3%
SCHG
6.7%

Industrials

FEQD.L
19.8%
SCHG
5.8%

Healthcare

FEQD.L
12.8%
SCHG
7.7%

Technology

FEQD.L
9.1%
SCHG
46.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FEQD.L
7.9%
SCHG
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

FEQD.L
6.7%
SCHG
1.7%

Energy

FEQD.L
5.4%
SCHG
0.8%

Basic Materials

FEQD.L
4.9%
SCHG
1.4%

Utilities

FEQD.L
4.7%
SCHG
0.4%

Communication Services

FEQD.L
3.6%
SCHG
16.0%

Real Estate

FEQD.L
1.0%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEQD.L vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQD.L
FEQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FEQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEQD.L) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEQD.LSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.57

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

4.43

+2.29

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQD.L and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEQD.LSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.72

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.81

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.92

-0.42

Drawdowns

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQD.L and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQD.LSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-27.53%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-16.56%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.44%

-26.67%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.06%

-27.53%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.16%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.76%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

5.85%

-2.96%

Volatility

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEQD.L) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEQD.LSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.46%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

10.62%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

15.07%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

21.07%

-6.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

21.42%

-6.43%

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEQD.L vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FEQD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEQD.L
Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEQD.L and SCHG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FEQD.L.

FEQD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FEQD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A., Irela and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FEQD.L and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEQD.L and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer