FEOE vs. HDMV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEOE (First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF) and HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEOE returned 32.06% vs 9.53% for HDMV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEOE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for HDMV.

Performance

FEOE vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEOE achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly higher than HDMV's 4.23% return.

FEOE

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 11.79%
• 6M: 14.94%
• 1Y: 32.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HDMV

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 6M: 5.97%
• 1Y: 9.53%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEOE vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEOE First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF	11.79%	41.33%	-0.42%
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF	4.23%	29.31%	0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FEOE and HDMV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	0.78

The correlation between FEOE and HDMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEOE vs. HDMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEOE	HDMV
Consumer Defensive	21.4%	13.0%
Industrials	15.3%	15.2%
Financial Services	13.4%	24.4%
Technology	12.7%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.7%	2.7%
Basic Materials	10.4%	1.0%
Energy	8.0%	1.8%
Healthcare	3.8%	3.1%
Real Estate	2.6%	13.8%
Communication Services	0.7%	9.4%
Utilities	-	14.6%

Return for Risk

FEOE vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEOE

FEOE Risk / Return Rank: 61
FEOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FEOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FEOE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FEOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FEOE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

HDMV

HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 24
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 23
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEOE vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEOE	HDMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	0.86	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	1.23	+1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.16	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	1.10	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.34	3.41	+5.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEOE vs. HDMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the HDMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEOE and HDMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEOE	HDMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	0.86	+1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.38	0.40	+1.98

Drawdowns

FEOE vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEOE drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum HDMV drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEOE and HDMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEOE	HDMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-32.01%	+19.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.27%	-8.73%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.33%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-6.05%	+3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-6.77%	+4.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	2.80%	+0.64%

Volatility

FEOE vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison

First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) at 3.83%. This indicates that FEOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEOE	HDMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	3.83%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	9.38%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.41%	11.16%	+3.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.63%	12.05%	+3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	13.24%	+2.39%

FEOE vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEOE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEOE vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison

FEOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than HDMV's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FEOE First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF	1.37%	1.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF	4.70%	5.09%	3.24%	3.14%	3.53%	3.11%	1.45%	3.63%	2.88%	3.23%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEOE and HDMV in my portfolio?

FEOE and HDMV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEOE or HDMV?

FEOE has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to HDMV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEOE dropped -12.27% vs HDMV's -32.01%.

Which ETF is better, FEOE or HDMV?

On 1-year performance, FEOE leads with 32.06% vs 9.53% for HDMV. On fees, FEOE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEOE or HDMV?

Over the 1-year period, FEOE has performed better with a 32.06% return vs 9.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEOE or HDMV?

FEOE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEOE or HDMV?

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 1.37% for FEOE.

What is the main difference between FEOE and HDMV?

They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEOE and 0.80% for HDMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.