FENY vs. IGF
FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FENY returned 9.32%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for IGF. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FENY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
FENY vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 31.30% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FENY has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 9.32%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.26% annualized return.
FENY
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 31.30%
- 6M
- 29.90%
- 1Y
- 44.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
IGF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
FENY vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 31.30% | 7.27% | 6.62% | -0.04% | 62.94% | 55.62% | -33.15% | 9.11% | -19.99% | -2.30% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 7.07% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FENY and IGF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FENY and IGF has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FENY vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FENY
IGF
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
FENY
IGF
Basic Materials
FENY
IGF
-
Industrials
FENY
IGF
Communication Services
FENY
-
IGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
FENY
-
IGF
-
Consumer Defensive
FENY
-
IGF
-
Financial Services
FENY
-
IGF
-
Healthcare
FENY
-
IGF
-
Real Estate
FENY
-
IGF
Technology
FENY
-
IGF
-
Utilities
FENY
-
IGF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FENY vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
FENY
IGF
FENY vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FENY | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 2.38 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 7.08 | +3.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FENY | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.32 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.70 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.49 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.23 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
FENY vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than IGF's maximum drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FENY | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.35% | -58.33% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -5.87% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -14.28% | -7.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -20.83% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | -42.11% | -26.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.04% | -5.29% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -11.87% | -11.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 1.97% | +2.10% |
Volatility
FENY vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.61%. This indicates that FENY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FENY | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 3.61% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.35% | 8.68% | +7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.38% | 10.56% | +9.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 14.00% | +12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 16.84% | +12.96% |
FENY vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FENY vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than IGF's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.43% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.01% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FENY and IGF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FENY has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to IGF (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FENY dropped -74.35% vs IGF's -58.33%.
On 10-year performance, FENY leads with 9.32% vs 8.26% for IGF. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FENY has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.43% for FENY.
FENY is categorized as Energy Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.39% for IGF.
FENY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FENY and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer