PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FENY vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FENY vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 31.30% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FENY has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 9.32%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.26% annualized return.


FENY

1D
1.22%
1M
3.82%
YTD
31.30%
6M
29.90%
1Y
44.41%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
9.32%

IGF

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
7.07%
6M
8.23%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FENY vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
31.30%7.27%6.62%-0.04%62.94%55.62%-33.15%9.11%-19.99%-2.30%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
7.07%21.31%14.81%6.14%-1.26%11.57%-6.50%25.82%-9.95%19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FENY and IGF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between FENY and IGF has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FENY vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FENY
IGF

Energy

99.7%
20.1%

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.1%
38.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

41.1%

Energy

FENY
99.7%
IGF
20.1%

Basic Materials

FENY
0.2%
IGF

-

Industrials

FENY
0.1%
IGF
38.8%

Communication Services

FENY

-

IGF

-

Consumer Cyclical

FENY

-

IGF

-

Consumer Defensive

FENY

-

IGF

-

Financial Services

FENY

-

IGF

-

Healthcare

FENY

-

IGF

-

Real Estate

FENY

-

IGF
0.1%

Technology

FENY

-

IGF

-

Utilities

FENY

-

IGF
41.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FENY vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FENY vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FENYIGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.38

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

7.08

+3.87

FENY vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FENY Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FENY and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FENYIGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.32

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.70

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.49

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.23

-0.04

Drawdowns

FENY vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than IGF's maximum drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and IGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FENYIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.35%

-58.33%

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-5.87%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

-14.28%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-20.83%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-42.11%

-26.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.04%

-5.29%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.11%

-11.87%

-11.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

1.97%

+2.10%

Volatility

FENY vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.61%. This indicates that FENY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FENYIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

3.61%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.35%

8.68%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.38%

10.56%

+9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.48%

14.00%

+12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.80%

16.84%

+12.96%

FENY vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FENY vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than IGF's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.43%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
3.01%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FENY and IGF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FENY has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to IGF (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FENY dropped -74.35% vs IGF's -58.33%.

On 10-year performance, FENY leads with 9.32% vs 8.26% for IGF. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FENY has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.43% for FENY.

FENY is categorized as Energy Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.39% for IGF.

FENY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FENY and IGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer