FEMV vs. FAB

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

FEMV (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF) and FAB (First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. FEMV is actively managed, while FAB is passively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FEMV charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FAB.

Performance

FEMV vs. FAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF (FEMV) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FEMV

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.61%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FAB

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.76%
• 6M: 13.31%
• YTD: 18.82%
• 1Y: 26.20%
• 3Y*: 13.81%
• 5Y*: 10.31%
• 10Y*: 10.82%
• ALL TIME*: 8.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	$3.06M	$2.61M	$970.74K
FEMV Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF	$30.73K	$43.86K	$125.28K

FEMV vs. FAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FEMV Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF	8.50%
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMV and FAB is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

FEMV vs. FAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FAB

FAB Risk / Return Rank: 86
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMV vs. FAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF (FEMV) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEMV	FAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.98	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.75	—

Drawdowns

FEMV vs. FAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMV drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum FAB drawdown of -63.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMV and FAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMV	FAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.69%	-63.29%	+60.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.65%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-9.19%	+8.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEMV	FAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.35%	13.35%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.35%	18.60%	-7.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.35%	21.96%	-10.61%

FEMV vs. FAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMV has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FAB's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMV vs. FAB - Dividend Comparison

FEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than FAB's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.52%	1.57%	2.00%	1.94%	1.80%	1.32%	1.59%	1.75%	1.96%	1.42%	1.40%	1.62%
FEMV Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMV and FAB in my portfolio?

FEMV and FAB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEMV or FAB?

On fees, FEMV is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMV or FAB?

FEMV is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEMV or FAB?

FAB has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.26% for FEMV.

What is the main difference between FEMV and FAB?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMV and 0.64% for FAB.