FEMV vs. DIV
FEMV (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. FEMV is actively managed, while DIV is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMV charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
FEMV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 14.22%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.06%
FEMV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMV Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF | 6.72% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMV and DIV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
FEMV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIV
FEMV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF (FEMV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEMV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEMV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMV drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMV and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -52.74% | +50.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -6.99% | +6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility
FEMV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 10.62% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 13.71% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 17.99% | -5.74% |
FEMV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMV has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
FEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than DIV's 6.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.67% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
FEMV Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMV and DIV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMV is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMV is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.26% for FEMV.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMV and 0.45% for DIV.
Find the right allocation for FEMV and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer