FEMS vs. ROAM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEMS (First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FEMS tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Small Cap Index while ROAM tracks the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEMS returned 9.49%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for ROAM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.

Performance

FEMS vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMS achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 26.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEMS having a 9.49% annualized return and ROAM not far ahead at 9.87%.

FEMS

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 12.16%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 24.48%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 4.43%
• 10Y*: 9.49%

ROAM

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 8.68%
• YTD: 26.83%
• 6M: 28.99%
• 1Y: 51.96%
• 3Y*: 26.00%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMS vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEMS First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund	12.16%	16.48%	1.88%	3.55%	1.85%	3.76%	7.85%	28.88%	-22.63%	49.02%
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	26.83%	32.08%	6.21%	21.28%	-14.78%	9.32%	2.24%	8.89%	-12.24%	27.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMS and ROAM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015	0.74

The correlation between FEMS and ROAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEMS vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEMS	ROAM
Industrials	16.0%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	15.4%	7.6%
Technology	13.1%	39.4%
Basic Materials	12.0%	4.1%
Energy	8.7%	5.3%
Real Estate	7.9%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	4.8%
Utilities	6.6%	2.3%
Financial Services	5.5%	19.3%
Communication Services	4.6%	6.0%
Healthcare	3.4%	3.3%

Return for Risk

FEMS vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMS

FEMS Risk / Return Rank: 47
FEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 46

ROAM

ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 91
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMS vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEMS	ROAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	3.50	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	4.48	-2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.63	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	5.27	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	19.91	-12.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEMS vs. ROAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the ROAM Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMS and ROAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEMS	ROAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	3.50	-1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.81	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.55	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.38	-0.11

Drawdowns

FEMS vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMS drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, which is greater than ROAM's maximum drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMS and ROAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMS	ROAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.85%	-45.47%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-9.92%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.09%	-16.79%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.89%	-27.07%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.85%	-45.47%	-2.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.88%	-1.60%	-3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.41%	-11.13%	-6.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	2.62%	+0.65%

Volatility

FEMS vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) have volatilities of 6.37% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMS	ROAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	6.41%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	12.76%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.84%	14.93%	+0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	15.23%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	17.87%	+2.10%

FEMS vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMS vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison

FEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than ROAM's 2.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEMS First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund	4.28%	4.27%	3.97%	4.65%	4.55%	6.25%	2.90%	4.37%	4.68%	3.39%	2.42%	3.28%
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	2.50%	3.17%	4.15%	5.40%	5.23%	4.22%	3.04%	3.55%	2.54%	1.84%	1.89%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMS and ROAM in my portfolio?

FEMS and ROAM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEMS or ROAM?

ROAM has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to FEMS (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMS dropped -47.85% vs ROAM's -45.47%.

Which ETF is better, FEMS or ROAM?

On 10-year performance, ROAM leads with 9.87% vs 9.49% for FEMS. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEMS or ROAM?

Over the 10-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMS or ROAM?

ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEMS or ROAM?

FEMS has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.50% for ROAM.

What is the main difference between FEMS and ROAM?

FEMS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Small Cap Index, while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEMS and 0.44% for ROAM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.