FEMG vs. TSCM
FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) and TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMG charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSCM.
Performance
FEMG vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSCM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMG vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 4.23% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 6.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMG and TSCM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMG vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMG | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.78 | 0.28 | +4.51 |
Drawdowns
FEMG vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum TSCM drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and TSCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMG | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -14.87% | +11.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.92% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -6.33% | +5.37% |
Volatility
FEMG vs. TSCM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMG | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 21.03% | -8.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 21.03% | -8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 21.03% | -8.74% |
FEMG vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMG vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEMG nor TSCM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMG and TSCM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
FEMG and TSCM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and TimesSquare Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.55% for TSCM.
Find the right allocation for FEMG and TSCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer