PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMG vs. TSCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMG vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FEMG

1D
-0.84%
1M
3.74%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSCM

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.27%
YTD
3.31%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMG vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEMG and TSCM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMG vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FEMG vs. TSCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMGTSCMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.78

0.28

+4.51

Drawdowns

FEMG vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum TSCM drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and TSCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMGTSCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-14.87%

+11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.92%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-6.33%

+5.37%

Volatility

FEMG vs. TSCM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMGTSCMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

21.03%

-8.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

21.03%

-8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

21.03%

-8.74%

FEMG vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMG vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEMG nor TSCM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMG and TSCM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.

FEMG and TSCM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and TimesSquare Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.55% for TSCM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMG and TSCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer