PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMG vs. SCHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMG vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FEMG

1D
-1.33%
1M
-1.76%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHM

1D
-0.54%
1M
-2.01%
6M
9.91%
YTD
17.66%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMG vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEMG and SCHM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026

0.73

FEMG vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEMG
SCHM

Technology

34.1%
22.1%

Industrials

20.7%
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
10.8%

Healthcare

12.0%
10.9%

Financial Services

5.2%
10.9%

Energy

3.6%
3.4%

Utilities

2.6%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
3.4%

Basic Materials

1.3%
4.7%

Technology

FEMG
34.1%
SCHM
22.1%

Industrials

FEMG
20.7%
SCHM
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FEMG
14.0%
SCHM
10.8%

Healthcare

FEMG
12.0%
SCHM
10.9%

Financial Services

FEMG
5.2%
SCHM
10.9%

Energy

FEMG
3.6%
SCHM
3.4%

Utilities

FEMG
2.6%
SCHM
2.9%

Communication Services

FEMG
2.4%
SCHM
2.6%

Real Estate

FEMG
2.0%
SCHM
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

FEMG
1.7%
SCHM
3.4%

Basic Materials

FEMG
1.3%
SCHM
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMG vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMG vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMGSCHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

FEMG vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMG vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum SCHM drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and SCHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMGSCHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-42.43%

+37.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-4.56%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-5.63%

+4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

Volatility

FEMG vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMGSCHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

16.51%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

19.70%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

20.46%

-3.55%

FEMG vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEMG vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

FEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SCHM's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.26%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMG and SCHM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FEMG.

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.10% for FEMG.

FEMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SCHM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.04% for SCHM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMG and SCHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer