PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEM vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEM vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEM achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 3.13% return.


FEM

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
20.27%
6M
22.14%
1Y
41.40%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
9.68%

KNG

1D
0.91%
1M
0.83%
YTD
3.13%
6M
3.55%
1Y
8.66%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEM vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
20.27%28.36%3.01%10.84%-14.24%7.40%-1.68%20.55%-18.28%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
3.13%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FEM and KNG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.48

The correlation between FEM and KNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEM vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEM
KNG

Technology

24.5%
4.3%

Industrials

20.9%
20.3%

Energy

14.1%
3.0%

Basic Materials

8.6%
10.2%

Financial Services

7.0%
12.7%

Utilities

6.2%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
5.5%

Communication Services

4.6%

-

Healthcare

3.1%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
23.5%

Real Estate

2.5%
4.4%

Technology

FEM
24.5%
KNG
4.3%

Industrials

FEM
20.9%
KNG
20.3%

Energy

FEM
14.1%
KNG
3.0%

Basic Materials

FEM
8.6%
KNG
10.2%

Financial Services

FEM
7.0%
KNG
12.7%

Utilities

FEM
6.2%
KNG
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FEM
5.7%
KNG
5.5%

Communication Services

FEM
4.6%
KNG

-

Healthcare

FEM
3.1%
KNG
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

FEM
2.8%
KNG
23.5%

Real Estate

FEM
2.5%
KNG
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEM vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEM
FEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEM vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEMKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.15

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

1.01

+3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.89

2.61

+14.29

FEM vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEM and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

0.85

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.33

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.50

-0.31

Drawdowns

FEM vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEM drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-35.12%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-8.61%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-14.24%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.72%

-18.20%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-5.03%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-4.13%

-10.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.33%

-0.87%

Volatility

FEM vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.26%. This indicates that FEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

2.26%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.47%

7.44%

+7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

10.22%

+7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

13.60%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

17.18%

+3.78%

FEM vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEM vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than KNG's 8.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%3.13%3.66%4.96%6.15%4.15%2.68%3.31%3.52%2.45%2.25%3.61%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.59%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEM and KNG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEM has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to KNG (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEM dropped -46.23% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FEM leads with 7.31% vs 4.50% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FEM has performed better with a 7.31% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.59%, compared with 2.58% for FEM.

FEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FEM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEM and 0.75% for KNG.

FEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEM and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer