FELG vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FELG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. FELG is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past year, FELG returned 20.00% vs 138.23% for SMH. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FELG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

FELG vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELG achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.

FELG

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: -7.01%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 72.73%
• 6M: 71.29%
• 1Y: 138.23%
• 3Y*: 62.28%
• 5Y*: 38.18%
• 10Y*: 37.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELG vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	2.26%	18.44%	35.45%	4.37%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.73%	49.17%	39.10%	8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FELG and SMH is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023	0.80

The correlation between FELG and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FELG vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FELG	SMH
Technology	54.2%	100.0%
Communication Services	12.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	-
Healthcare	7.0%	-
Industrials	6.1%	-
Financial Services	4.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	-
Utilities	1.0%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

FELG vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 32
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELG vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FELG	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	3.99	-2.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	4.05	-2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.58	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	9.31	-8.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.14	33.88	-29.74

FELG vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELG and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FELG vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELG drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELG and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELG	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.89%	-84.96%	+61.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-14.93%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.32%	-7.01%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-41.01%	+37.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.84%	4.10%	+0.74%

Volatility

FELG vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is 6.15%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that FELG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELG	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	19.08%	-12.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.66%	29.18%	-16.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.29%	34.87%	-18.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.00%	35.83%	-15.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.00%	32.97%	-12.97%

FELG vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FELG vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

FELG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELG and SMH in my portfolio?

FELG and SMH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FELG or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to FELG (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELG dropped -23.89% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, FELG or SMH?

On 1-year performance, SMH leads with 138.23% vs 20.00% for FELG. On fees, FELG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELG has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FELG or SMH?

Over the 1-year period, SMH has performed better with a 138.23% return vs 20.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FELG or SMH?

FELG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FELG or SMH?

FELG has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

What is the main difference between FELG and SMH?

FELG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELG and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.