FEBU vs. AIOO
FEBU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEBU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.
Performance
FEBU vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEBU achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.13% return.
FEBU
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 6.09%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIOO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEBU vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEBU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF | 6.09% | 7.81% |
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 2.13% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEBU and AIOO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEBU vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank
FEBU
AIOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FEBU vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEBU | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.45 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEBU vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEBU drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBU and AIOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEBU | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -0.74% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -0.34% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -0.18% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | — | — |
Volatility
FEBU vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEBU | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.88% | 2.06% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 2.06% | +9.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 2.06% | +9.56% |
FEBU vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEBU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEBU vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEBU nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FEBU and AIOO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FEBU.
FEBU and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FEBU and 0.64% for AIOO.
Find the right allocation for FEBU and AIOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer