PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEBU vs. STEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEBU vs. STEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBU achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly lower than STEN's 7.45% return.


FEBU

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
7.02%
6M
6.63%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STEN

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.52%
YTD
7.45%
6M
7.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBU vs. STEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEBU and STEN is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEBU vs. STEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBU
FEBU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FEBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FEBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEBU Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

STEN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBU vs. STEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEBUSTENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

FEBU vs. STEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEBU vs. STEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBU drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, which is greater than STEN's maximum drawdown of -6.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBU and STEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEBUSTENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-6.21%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.61%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-0.93%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

FEBU vs. STEN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEBUSTENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.86%

9.42%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

9.42%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.61%

9.42%

+2.19%

FEBU vs. STEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than STEN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEBU vs. STEN - Dividend Comparison

FEBU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FEBU and STEN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, STEN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STEN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FEBU.

STEN has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for FEBU.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FEBU and 0.50% for STEN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEBU and STEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer