RCAT vs. UMAC
RCAT (Red Cat Holdings, Inc.) and UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc) are both stocks. RCAT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while UMAC operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past year, RCAT returned 54.73% vs 174.57% for UMAC. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCAT vs. UMAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCAT achieves a 34.05% return, which is significantly lower than UMAC's 77.16% return.
RCAT
- 1D
- -7.08%
- 1M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 34.05%
- 6M
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 54.73%
- 3Y*
- 108.07%
- 5Y*
- 33.36%
- 10Y*
- —
UMAC
- 1D
- -9.65%
- 1M
- 34.51%
- YTD
- 77.16%
- 6M
- 89.50%
- 1Y
- 174.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCAT vs. UMAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc. | 34.05% | -38.29% | 1,971.24% |
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc | 77.16% | -24.26% | 320.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCAT and UMAC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, RCAT and UMAC have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
RCAT:
$1.28B
UMAC:
$1.09B
RCAT:
-$0.78
UMAC:
-$0.18
RCAT:
22.09
UMAC:
41.37
RCAT:
5.38
UMAC:
3.28
RCAT:
$52.98M
UMAC:
$17.25M
RCAT:
$2.86M
UMAC:
$5.92M
RCAT:
-$79.24M
UMAC:
-$28.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCAT vs. UMAC — Risk / Return Rank
RCAT
UMAC
RCAT vs. UMAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCAT | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 3.34 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 6.75 | -4.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCAT vs. UMAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCAT drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than UMAC's maximum drawdown of -75.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCAT and UMAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCAT | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.25% | -75.61% | -16.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.08% | -52.63% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.77% | -32.47% | -6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -45.97% | -16.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.05% | 25.97% | +4.08% |
Volatility
RCAT vs. UMAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) is 42.04%, while Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) has a volatility of 61.80%. This indicates that RCAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCAT | UMAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.04% | 61.80% | -19.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 85.16% | 100.24% | -15.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.89% | 133.15% | -14.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.60% | 164.29% | -49.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 165.21% | 164.29% | +0.92% |
Dividends
RCAT vs. UMAC - Dividend Comparison
Neither RCAT nor UMAC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RCAT vs. UMAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Cat Holdings, Inc. and Unusual Machines, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RCAT and UMAC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMAC has higher volatility (61.80%) compared to RCAT (42.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCAT dropped -92.25% vs UMAC's -75.61%.
UMAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCAT and UMAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer