FEAM vs. CCL
FEAM (5E Advanced Materials Inc) and CCL (Carnival Corporation & Plc) are both stocks. FEAM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while CCL operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, FEAM returned -71.96%/yr vs 31.13%/yr for CCL. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FEAM vs. CCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -42.62% return, which is significantly lower than CCL's -10.08% return.
FEAM
- 1D
- -5.91%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- -42.62%
- 6M
- -56.03%
- 1Y
- -60.23%
- 3Y*
- -71.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCL
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- -10.08%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 31.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.10%
- 10Y*
- -4.22%
FEAM vs. CCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc | -42.62% | -79.28% | -54.61% | -82.11% | -76.13% |
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | -10.08% | 22.55% | 34.41% | 130.02% | -55.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAM and CCL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2022 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
FEAM:
$61.10M
CCL:
$37.82B
FEAM:
-$1.76
CCL:
$2.21
FEAM:
0.84
CCL:
2.90
FEAM:
$0.00
CCL:
$26.98B
FEAM:
-$10.56M
CCL:
$10.13B
FEAM:
-$22.23M
CCL:
$7.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAM vs. CCL — Risk / Return Rank
FEAM
CCL
FEAM vs. CCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAM | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | 0.32 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | 0.83 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.10 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 0.51 | -1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 1.04 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAM | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 0.32 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.70 | 0.17 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
FEAM vs. CCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than CCL's maximum drawdown of -90.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and CCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAM | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -90.37% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.66% | -29.30% | -53.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.85% | -42.85% | -56.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -79.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -58.53% | -41.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.37% | -28.56% | -57.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.23% | 14.24% | +36.99% |
Volatility
FEAM vs. CCL - Volatility Comparison
5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) has a higher volatility of 35.53% compared to Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) at 14.73%. This indicates that FEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAM | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.53% | 14.73% | +20.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.61% | 37.52% | +35.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.39% | 46.45% | +66.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.54% | 55.38% | +54.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.54% | 57.55% | +51.99% |
Dividends
FEAM vs. CCL - Dividend Comparison
FEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 3.93% | 3.96% | 2.41% | 2.59% | 2.02% |
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FEAM vs. CCL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 5E Advanced Materials Inc and Carnival Corporation & Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAM and CCL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAM has higher volatility (35.53%) compared to CCL (14.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs CCL's -90.37%.
CCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAM and CCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer