FEAM vs. PRGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FEAM (5E Advanced Materials Inc) and PRGS (Progress Software Corporation) are both stocks. FEAM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while PRGS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, FEAM returned -74.33%/yr vs -19.45%/yr for PRGS. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FEAM vs. PRGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -44.26% return, which is significantly lower than PRGS's -26.75% return.

FEAM

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -11.92%
• YTD: -44.26%
• 6M: -55.50%
• 1Y: -57.90%
• 3Y*: -74.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRGS

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 17.43%
• YTD: -26.75%
• 6M: -29.75%
• 1Y: -49.74%
• 3Y*: -19.45%
• 5Y*: -7.35%
• 10Y*: 3.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAM vs. PRGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc	-44.26%	-79.28%	-54.61%	-82.11%	-73.73%
PRGS Progress Software Corporation	-26.75%	-34.06%	21.16%	8.94%	18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAM and PRGS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2022	0.12

The correlation between FEAM and PRGS shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap FEAM : $59.35M PRGS : $1.34B
EPS FEAM : -$1.76 PRGS : $1.95
PB Ratio FEAM : 0.81 PRGS : 2.70
Total Revenue (TTM) FEAM : $0.00 PRGS : $987.62M
Gross Profit (TTM) FEAM : -$10.56M PRGS : $802.40M
EBITDA (TTM) FEAM : -$22.23M PRGS : $136.06M

Return for Risk

FEAM vs. PRGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAM

FEAM Risk / Return Rank: 21
FEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 18

PRGS

PRGS Risk / Return Rank: 8
PRGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PRGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PRGS Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PRGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PRGS Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAM vs. PRGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAM	PRGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	-1.03	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	-1.54	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.81	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	-0.82	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.10	-1.30	+0.19

FEAM vs. PRGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is higher than the PRGS Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAM and PRGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAM vs. PRGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than PRGS's maximum drawdown of -67.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and PRGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAM	PRGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.84%	-67.33%	-32.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.66%	-61.14%	-21.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.85%	-64.10%	-34.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-64.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.78%	-54.97%	-44.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.38%	-23.57%	-62.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.56%	38.81%	+13.75%

Volatility

FEAM vs. PRGS - Volatility Comparison

5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) has a higher volatility of 27.75% compared to Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) at 14.81%. This indicates that FEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAM	PRGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.75%	14.81%	+12.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	75.44%	41.69%	+33.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.11%	48.89%	+66.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.76%	33.42%	+76.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.76%	33.17%	+76.59%

Dividends

FEAM vs. PRGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEAM nor PRGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRGS Progress Software Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.81%	1.29%	1.39%	1.45%	1.48%	1.52%	1.62%	1.21%	0.39%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAM and PRGS in my portfolio?

FEAM and PRGS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAM or PRGS?

FEAM has higher volatility (27.75%) compared to PRGS (14.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs PRGS's -67.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.