FEAM vs. MU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FEAM (5E Advanced Materials Inc) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. FEAM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, FEAM returned -74.33%/yr vs 144.69%/yr for MU. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FEAM vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -44.26% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return.

FEAM

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -11.92%
• YTD: -44.26%
• 6M: -55.50%
• 1Y: -57.90%
• 3Y*: -74.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MU

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 35.46%
• YTD: 244.07%
• 6M: 307.41%
• 1Y: 751.18%
• 3Y*: 144.69%
• 5Y*: 66.21%
• 10Y*: 55.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAM vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc	-44.26%	-79.28%	-54.61%	-82.11%	-73.73%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	244.07%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-27.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAM and MU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2022	0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap FEAM : $59.35M MU : $1.12T
EPS FEAM : -$1.76 MU : $21.26
PB Ratio FEAM : 0.81 MU : 15.44
Total Revenue (TTM) FEAM : $0.00 MU : $58.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) FEAM : -$10.56M MU : $33.96B
EBITDA (TTM) FEAM : -$22.23M MU : $25.99B

Return for Risk

FEAM vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAM

FEAM Risk / Return Rank: 21
FEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 18

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAM vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAM	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	10.83	-11.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	6.14	-6.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.78	-0.82
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	24.91	-25.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.10	94.64	-95.74

FEAM vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 10.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAM and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAM vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAM	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.84%	-98.25%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.66%	-30.28%	-52.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.85%	-57.63%	-41.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.78%	-9.07%	-90.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.38%	-58.16%	-28.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.56%	7.95%	+44.61%

Volatility

FEAM vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) is 27.75%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that FEAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAM	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.75%	32.86%	-5.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	75.44%	57.74%	+17.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.11%	69.66%	+45.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.76%	53.18%	+56.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.76%	50.12%	+59.64%

Dividends

FEAM vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

FEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.05%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAM and MU in my portfolio?

FEAM and MU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAM or MU?

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to FEAM (27.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.