PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNXC vs. GD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNXC vs. GD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXC achieves a -38.46% return, which is significantly lower than GD's 15.39% return.


CNXC

1D
-1.20%
1M
5.98%
6M
-32.13%
YTD
-38.46%
1Y
-44.21%
3Y*
-31.16%
5Y*
-30.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-17.21%

GD

1D
0.32%
1M
2.64%
6M
10.20%
YTD
15.39%
1Y
25.57%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
12.38%
ALL TIME*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.06M$36.42M$44.36M
$513.72M$452.34M$446.02M

CNXC vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CNXC
Concentrix Corporation
-38.46%-1.39%-55.03%-25.36%-24.91%81.22%23.38%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
15.39%30.39%3.52%7.13%21.69%43.77%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CNXC and GD is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.24

The correlation between CNXC and GD shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNXC:

$1.50B

GD:

$103.74B

EPS

CNXC:

-$21.21

GD:

$16.41

PS Ratio

CNXC:

0.15

GD:

1.91

PB Ratio

CNXC:

0.56

GD:

3.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNXC:

$10.00B

GD:

$54.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNXC:

$3.24B

GD:

$8.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNXC:

-$619.49M

GD:

$5.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNXC vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNXC
CNXC Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CNXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXC Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNXC vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNXCGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.22

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

1.74

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

5.84

-7.12

CNXC vs. GD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXC Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the GD Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXC and GD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNXC vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXC drawdown since its inception was -88.88%, which is greater than GD's maximum drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXC and GD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNXCGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.88%

-75.67%

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.14%

-14.53%

-47.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.48%

-22.55%

-55.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.88%

-22.55%

-66.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.74%

-2.48%

-84.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.64%

-15.57%

-33.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.53%

4.33%

+35.20%

Volatility

CNXC vs. GD - Volatility Comparison

Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) has a higher volatility of 24.58% compared to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) at 6.08%. This indicates that CNXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNXCGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.58%

6.08%

+18.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.68%

17.70%

+38.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.65%

21.81%

+44.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.16%

20.64%

+29.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.97%

22.82%

+28.15%

Dividends

CNXC vs. GD - Dividend Comparison

CNXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than GD's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNXC
Concentrix Corporation
5.85%3.27%2.87%1.15%0.77%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.61%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%

Financials

CNXC vs. GD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Concentrix Corporation and General Dynamics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CNXC vs. GD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Concentrix Corporation and General Dynamics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CNXC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported a gross profit of 823.35M and revenue of 2.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 14.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.5%.

CNXC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported an operating income of 95.42M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 14.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.

CNXC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported a net income of 55.28M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.16B and revenue of 14.09B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CNXC and GD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNXC has higher volatility (24.58%) compared to GD (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXC dropped -88.88% vs GD's -75.67%.

GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNXC and GD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer