FEAC vs. THLV
FEAC (Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FEAC is actively managed, while THLV is passively managed. Over the past year, FEAC returned 30.36% vs 18.29% for THLV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEAC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for THLV.
Performance
FEAC vs. THLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than THLV's 9.49% return.
FEAC
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 6.25%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 30.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THLV
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEAC vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 12.42% | 18.01% | -1.69% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 9.49% | 10.50% | -4.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAC and THLV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FEAC and THLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAC vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank
FEAC
THLV
FEAC vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 1.87 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 2.65 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.33 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 2.76 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.36 | 8.38 | +7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 1.87 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.88 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
FEAC vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and THLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -13.15% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -6.66% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.99% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -3.74% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.19% | -0.33% |
Volatility
FEAC vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) is 3.10%, while THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that FEAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 3.45% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 7.48% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 9.84% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 11.73% | +5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 11.73% | +5.77% |
FEAC vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEAC vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison
FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than THLV's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 0.85% | 0.94% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAC and THLV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THLV has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to FEAC (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs THLV's -13.15%.
On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 30.36% vs 18.29% for THLV. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FEAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 30.36% return vs 18.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.
THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.85% for FEAC.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.64% for THLV.
FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAC and THLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer