PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAC vs. THLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEAC vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 10.47% return.


FEAC

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
9.76%
6M
8.32%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

THLV

1D
0.24%
1M
1.47%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.74%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
12.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAC vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
9.76%18.01%-1.87%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
10.47%10.50%-3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and THLV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.69

The correlation between FEAC and THLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAC vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAC vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEACTHLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.70

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

8.01

+4.47

FEAC vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and THLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and THLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEACTHLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-13.15%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-6.66%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-1.11%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-3.73%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.24%

-0.29%

Volatility

FEAC vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.92%. This indicates that FEAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEACTHLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

3.92%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

8.03%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

10.27%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

11.81%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

11.81%

+5.81%

FEAC vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEAC vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than THLV's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
0.79%0.94%0.12%0.00%0.00%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.60%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEAC and THLV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEAC has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to THLV (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs THLV's -13.15%.

On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 24.28% vs 17.87% for THLV. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 24.28% return vs 17.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.79% for FEAC.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.64% for THLV.

FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAC and THLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer