PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAC vs. FTIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEAC vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 24.04% return.


FEAC

1D
0.68%
1M
0.95%
6M
10.99%
YTD
12.32%
1Y
25.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.84%

FTIF

1D
0.18%
1M
4.50%
6M
14.08%
YTD
24.04%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$176.34K$659.55K$548.25K
$126.29K$72.10K$61.82K

FEAC vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and FTIF is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.54

The correlation between FEAC and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAC vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEAC vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEACFTIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

4.88

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.82

14.19

-2.37

FEAC vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and FTIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEACFTIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-27.83%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-6.34%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-1.90%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-5.90%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.20%

-0.20%

Volatility

FEAC vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 2.73%. This indicates that FEAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEACFTIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

2.73%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

10.51%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

15.04%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

18.73%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

18.73%

-1.44%

FEAC vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEAC vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than FTIF's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
0.77%0.94%0.12%0.00%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.08%1.45%2.88%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEAC and FTIF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEAC has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to FTIF (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

On 1-year performance, FTIF leads with 33.91% vs 25.23% for FEAC. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 33.91% return vs 25.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.77% for FEAC.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.60% for FTIF.

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAC and FTIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer