PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FDVV vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FDVV vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while EFAS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.53%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for EFAS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

FDVV vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 15.45% return.

FDVV

1D
0.57%
1M
3.73%
YTD
9.30%
6M
9.44%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
—

EFAS

1D
0.16%
1M
0.85%
YTD
15.45%
6M
18.87%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF		9.30%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF		15.45%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and EFAS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016

0.62

The correlation between FDVV and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDVV vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FDVV
EFAS

Technology

30.5%
0.1%

Financial Services

17.0%
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
8.1%

Real Estate

9.9%
11.4%

Utilities

8.6%
13.7%

Communication Services

3.6%
8.6%

Healthcare

3.0%
0.1%

Industrials

3.0%
10.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Energy

-

13.1%

Technology

FDVV
30.5%
EFAS
0.1%

Financial Services

FDVV
17.0%
EFAS
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FDVV
13.6%
EFAS
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FDVV
10.7%
EFAS
8.1%

Real Estate

FDVV
9.9%
EFAS
11.4%

Utilities

FDVV
8.6%
EFAS
13.7%

Communication Services

FDVV
3.6%
EFAS
8.6%

Healthcare

FDVV
3.0%
EFAS
0.1%

Industrials

FDVV
3.0%
EFAS
10.4%

Basic Materials

FDVV

-

EFAS
1.7%

Energy

FDVV

-

EFAS
13.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF

Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF

Often compared with FDVV:
FDVV vs. SCHDFDVV vs. VYMFDVV vs. VOOFDVV vs. SPYDFDVV vs. FDRRFDVV vs. DESFDVV vs. FGRIX
Often compared with EFAS:
EFAS vs. EFAEFAS vs. EFAVEFAS vs. FDHYEFAS vs. SDEMEFAS vs. EWJVEFAS vs. IOOEFAS vs. DVYA

Return for Risk

FDVV vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FDVVEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.24
2.75

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.14
3.86

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

5.64

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

14.75

-4.64

FDVV vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and EFAS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FDVVEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-44.38%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-5.30%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-11.84%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

-28.81%

+8.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.87%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-7.06%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.02%

+0.22%

Volatility

FDVV vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 3.16%, while Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FDVVEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

3.35%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

8.58%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

10.87%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

15.62%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

18.32%

-1.34%

FDVV vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDVV vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than EFAS's 4.62% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF		4.62%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF		2.70%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

FDVV and EFAS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAS has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to FDVV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.53% vs 12.41% for EFAS. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.70% for FDVV.

FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EFAS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVV and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer