PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDVV vs. DBEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDVV vs. DBEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than DBEF's 9.52% return.


FDVV

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.68%
YTD
7.59%
6M
7.85%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*

DBEF

1D
0.82%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.55%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. DBEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
7.59%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
9.52%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and DBEF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.77

The correlation between FDVV and DBEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDVV vs. DBEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDVV
DBEF

Technology

29.1%
10.3%

Financial Services

17.0%
24.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
6.8%

Real Estate

10.1%
1.9%

Utilities

8.7%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
4.5%

Industrials

3.4%
19.9%

Healthcare

3.1%
10.5%

Basic Materials

-

5.9%

Energy

-

4.1%

Technology

FDVV
29.1%
DBEF
10.3%

Financial Services

FDVV
17.0%
DBEF
24.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDVV
13.6%
DBEF
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDVV
11.0%
DBEF
6.8%

Real Estate

FDVV
10.1%
DBEF
1.9%

Utilities

FDVV
8.7%
DBEF
3.9%

Communication Services

FDVV
3.7%
DBEF
4.5%

Industrials

FDVV
3.4%
DBEF
19.9%

Healthcare

FDVV
3.1%
DBEF
10.5%

Basic Materials

FDVV

-

DBEF
5.9%

Energy

FDVV

-

DBEF
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDVV vs. DBEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. DBEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDVVDBEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.44

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

10.24

-0.23

FDVV vs. DBEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the DBEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and DBEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDVVDBEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.83

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.95

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.55

+0.24

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. DBEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, which is greater than DBEF's maximum drawdown of -32.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and DBEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDVVDBEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-32.46%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-9.41%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-14.62%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

-14.95%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.26%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-4.73%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.24%

0.00%

Volatility

FDVV vs. DBEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 2.96%, while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDVVDBEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

3.60%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

10.41%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.07%

12.59%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

13.78%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

15.81%

+1.18%

FDVV vs. DBEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEF's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDVV vs. DBEF - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than DBEF's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
5.07%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.74%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDVV and DBEF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEF has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to FDVV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs DBEF's -32.46%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.25% vs 12.96% for DBEF. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 12.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for DBEF.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 2.74% for FDVV.

FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBEF is Hedge Fund. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.36% for DBEF.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVV and DBEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer