FDVLX vs. SCHG
FDVLX (Fidelity Value Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - FDVLX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, FDVLX returned 14.15%/yr vs 18.50%/yr for SCHG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVLX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
FDVLX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDVLX achieves a 17.78% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FDVLX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.15%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.
FDVLX
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 17.78%
- 6M
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
FDVLX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 17.78% | 11.32% | 30.11% | 19.57% | -9.07% | 35.30% | 9.33% | 31.68% | -17.58% | 14.11% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVLX and SCHG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDVLX and SCHG has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVLX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FDVLX
SCHG
FDVLX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDVLX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.21 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 1.14 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.37 | 3.78 | +8.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDVLX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVLX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.91% | -34.59% | -32.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -16.41% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.45% | -23.39% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -34.59% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.66% | -34.59% | -14.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.33% | +5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -5.20% | -3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 4.96% | -2.26% |
Volatility
FDVLX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVLX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.14% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 12.30% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 15.95% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.60% | 22.33% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 21.58% | +3.62% |
FDVLX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVLX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 8.53% | 10.05% | 33.05% | 3.71% | 7.08% | 9.79% | 0.98% | 3.34% | 16.25% | 3.38% | 1.26% | 10.97% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDVLX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVLX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVLX dropped -66.91% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
FDVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVLX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer