FDV vs. CDC
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC).
FDV and CDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDV is an actively managed fund by Federated. It was launched on Nov 15, 2022. CDC is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014.
Performance
FDV vs. CDC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDV vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 8.46% | 11.01% | 14.41% | -2.16% | 1.92% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 9.03% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -1.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDV achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 9.03% return.
FDV
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDC
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDV vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
CDC
FDV vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDV | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 4.90 | -0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDV | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.74 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and CDC is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDV vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than CDC's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 2.98% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 3.54% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.19% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
Drawdowns
FDV vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, smaller than the maximum CDC drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and CDC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -21.37% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -11.27% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -3.07% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -5.14% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.84% | -0.09% |
Volatility
FDV vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) have volatilities of 3.08% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 2.97% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.93% | 7.03% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 13.63% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 12.56% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 13.22% | -0.44% |