PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTTX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTTX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTTX achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 11.56% return.


FDTTX

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.23%
YTD
9.71%
6M
11.74%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
15.90%
10Y*
15.54%

FNILX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.04%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTTX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDTTX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A
9.71%27.28%26.68%23.86%-8.28%24.97%8.84%30.98%-16.42%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
11.56%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTTX and FNILX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.90

The correlation between FDTTX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTTX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTTX
FDTTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FDTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTTX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTTXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.45

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.28

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.01

15.01

0.00

FDTTX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTTX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTTXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.48

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.82

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.76

-0.23

Drawdowns

FDTTX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTTX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTTXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.00%

-33.76%

-24.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-9.01%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.03%

-19.08%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-25.40%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-5.37%

-5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.97%

+0.14%

Volatility

FDTTX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTTXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.88%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

8.99%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

11.93%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.25%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

20.04%

-1.20%

FDTTX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTTX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FDTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.81%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTTX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A
9.81%10.77%9.20%4.34%5.64%5.60%4.40%7.49%16.04%5.52%2.74%5.82%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FDTTX and FNILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDTTX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to FNILX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTTX dropped -58.00% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FDTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTTX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer